The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 02:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doncaster live (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable. Originally deleted once by User:Deb - not sure if it was speedy or just the user's own decision, mind - but recreated and A7 turned down this time, by User:Moonriddengirl. Anyway, nn in my eyes. Only ref is a first-party source, from Myspace. Google search for '"Doncaster live" magazine' brings up a *few* sources, most of which are unrelated (mostly on a namesake festival hosted in Doncaster). Only source I could find was: [1] , which I don't think is reliable enough, and doesn't have any info except verification that it exists. Considering it was only created last month it's far too soon, really. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 20:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A7 doesn't apply to print material, but that doesn't mean it satisfies WP:Notability. :) --Moonriddengirl 12:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEWS, WP:NOT, and WP:CRYSTAL - it's brand new, free magazine, and may not last a year. Bearian 21:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 22:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.