The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don Pizarro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. The article lacks reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. ttonyb (talk) 18:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. BurtAlert (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —BurtAlert (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —BurtAlert (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now or userfy because it is very difficult to source e-book authors. This is even worse for a common name. I've found a lot of online sources, but this will take many days to sort through the cruft and blogs from reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 17:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Even if we take everything in the article as accurate, he doesn't seem to meet the standard notability criteria for writers. Chick Bowen 01:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. - SudoGhost (talk) 01:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, essentially a resume with no indication of notability per WP:CREATIVE, does not appear to meet WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.