The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No consensus to Delete, and after a re-list, the consensus to Keep was upheld with further RS that went unchallenged (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 16:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Domio[edit]

Domio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources were either Press releases or sponsored by company. Paid editing concerns as well Catorce2016 (talk) 11:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Struck, blocked by an admin because of the username violation. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The humbug and stricken !votes above notwithstanding. While I agree that it is clear that the article needs some fluff trimmed: it is hard to argue with the RS of Bloomberg, Forbes and The Tennessean...The Wall Street Journal. Wm335td (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.