The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disciplined Agile Delivery

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed deletion removed by creator. Referenced to the system's official website and its creator; the only independent reference is completely irrelevant. Fails to establish notability. According to User:FreeRangeFrog, the "term [was] coined by a company/person/author that is not widely used in the industry; article is essentially a promotional piece for a book." [1] - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My PROD was actually in error since it was the second one, however my rationale holds: Term coined by a company/person/author that is not widely used in the industry; article is essentially a promotional piece for a book. It's also an ad for a website. WP:COI issues aside (the author of the article is the same that runs the blog/website linked to from the article), the term itself fails WP:GNG. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PROMO and WP:GNG PianoDan (talk) 13:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.