The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mkativerata (talk) 20:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dimbeswar Neog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Insufficient sources. I tried to find additional sources, to no avail. I also asked the creator to do the same, but none were forthcoming. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: With the newly added sources, appears to meet GNG. Especially, I think the claim in the official encyclopedia of India's Sahitya Akademi which praises his contributions to Assamese literary criticism, shows that he was a notable individual in his field. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As nominator, I now change my mind. Thanks to those who have found refs and fixed up the article. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.