The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect (after merge) to Mergers and acquisitions. Tikiwont (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between mergers and acquisitions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This does not merit its own page, and has already been merged with (or more accurately, acquired by) mergers and acquisitions. Juansidious (talk) 02:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Mergers and acquisitions; redundant content.--TBC!?! 03:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Mergers and acquisitions. This is useful and encyclopedic info., but is better there. If it's already been merged, just redirect. JJL (talk) 04:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per above. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep and redirect to Mergers and acquisitions. If this article has been merged into Mergers and acquisitions, then deletion would violate the GFDL, specifically section 4i which requires a history of edits to be maintained. EALacey (talk) 20:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.