The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete When an article tells us what level of honors an academic got for their PhD it is not a good sign. At least in the subject of history of philosophy it generally takes quite some time to make a significant impact enough to fulfill academic criteria 1. Fusaro has not reached that point.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN person, Italian wiki page is just a vanity page with anything concrete. Also, the page was created by a paid editor. 151.53.30.131 (talk) 11:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete quote discussion above. Furthermore also the discussion for deletion of the Italian page was superficial and probably lead by fans rather than average impartial users. --AlanGiulio (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.