The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily Deleted (non-admin closure) by Orangemike per CSD G4 as recreation of deleted material. WilliamH (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dickipedia[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Non-notable, advertising, re-creation of deleted content. Probably speedy anyway. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Maybe merge any useful content into 23/6 and redirect? -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 03:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like an ad. CRocka05 (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dickepedia appears to be designed to be a mirror site of Wikipedia right down to its visual design. A google search turned up an impressive 29,000+ hits though though many were from blog sites though. Not a WP:RS this might hint at some notability. Artene50 (talk) 08:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not quite blatant enough to be speedied for advertising, and the addition of 'sources' brings it above the level of 'recreated content' but the sources don't really establish notability or reason to keep this article. Shereth 17:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete G4 (repost). So tagged. Previously AFD'd. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.