The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond Valley, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Prescott subdivision, according to the real estate sites and listings. Everything else either just considers it a neighborhood of Prescott or (in the case of businesses there) doesn't mention it at all. Mangoe (talk) 04:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable subdivision. –dlthewave ☎ 22:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND Populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the GNG. Lightburst (talk) 01:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Subdivisions are not generally notable. This one doesn't seem to be any different. Glendoremus (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.