The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Speedy deleted by Sphilbrick per WP:CSD#G12 -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Kevra

[edit]
Derek Kevra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG. Not even notable within the meteorology spectrum. JTtheOG (talk) 16:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agree I agree with the deletion recommendation as this clearly doesn't satisfy any notability requirements. Hermera34 (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 01:21, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 01:21, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.