The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 06:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Demoniac Dance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

non-notable book which has not even been written. Merkinsmum 16:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't be notable in itself anyway, but not even written yet.Merkinsmum 16:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Not even best-selling authors get wiki pages for books they haven't yet written. should be deleted immediately. Drunkenmonkey111 17:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as crystalballery. Once release information is out, if the author is notable, no prejudice to recreating the article. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. JohnCD 17:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 17:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 17:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.