The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Degrassi timeline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete Unnecessary cruft and unattributable; also, per the AfD discussion over the GTA III canon timeline, which is incredibly similar to this. Now, if you could so kindly bring on the "I like it" arguments. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 01:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I like it. NOT! Delete because it's just too specific even for a popular fictional series. YechielMan 02:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I believe my opinion of fictional timelines' appropriateness for Wikipedia is on record. Strong delete for all the same reasons as given in the Harry Potter AfD. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 10:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per arguments above. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 12:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Iridescenti. Kntrabssi 14:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 17:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete same reasoning as Iridescenti.
• Delete as above. --Duke of Duchess Street 17:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.