The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deer Lake School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing anything notable about this school. All of the sources in the article are primary and nothing come up when I did a WP:BEFORE about it that would establish notability. The article is also written like an advertisment and mostly contains extremely trivial information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamant1 (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• As the article creator, I am likely not permitted to vote. However, I would like to point out that the statement that there are no secondary sources cited in the article is incorrect. While I did cite the school's own website a number of times, there are plenty of secondary sources cited in the article. NorthernFalcon (talk) 06:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please note that being the article creator certainly does not rule you out of expressing a !vote. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you. Vote to keep If there are any deficiencies in the article, please let me know, and I will fix them. NorthernFalcon (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I must have missed the one source out of the sixteen in the article that wasn't primary. My bad. I guess I should probably withdraw the AfD now for lying. As if. It still doesn't pass the notability guidelines. Even if you did include one non-primary source. Adamant1 (talk) 12:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - although this article needs considerable tender loving care, it does show this is a notable subject. John from Idegon (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly shows it's notable? --Adamant1 (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not seeing how the entity meets WP:NSCHOOL. At best, it has few mentions in passing, but no in-depth coverage, analysis of significance or such outside its own PRIMARY materials. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.