The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone wants to transwiki the content, please let me know and I will provide the text and history. --jonny-m t 14:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn of War Units, Buildings, Upgrades, and Abilities

[edit]

Wikipedia is not a gamefaq, similar pages have already been deleted in the past (pretty much for every popular videogame out there), also there is already a Dawn of War wiki: [1] Kessingler (talk) 22:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOT#MANUAL Cambrasa (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a game guide -- Whpq (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~Fancruft~~. Also, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age of Empires III military units & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buildings of Age of Empires III, 2 similiar debates, have had as a result "delete"; so I suppose that the result should be the same here. ♠TomasBat 21:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another 05:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Not a game guide, and "fancruft" is never an appropriate reason for deleting an article. MalikCarr (talk) 20:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No assertion of notability through reliable sources. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and tag for cleanup The article's brand new. Give it a little time-- we don't have deadlines around here. Assertions of cruft violate WP:AGF and should be discounted. Jtrainor (talk) 03:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and delete in-depth list which gives undue weight to individual minor aspects of gameplay, WP is not GameFAQs [2]. Belongs on strategywiki, encyclopedia gamia or a Warhammer wiki where it can continue to be developed. Someone another 10:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.