The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Neil☎ 10:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO Pilotbob 05:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sounds like a promotional/vanity piece. There's a semi-notable actor of the same name which obscures the Google search [1][2]. Search for Daniel South tract gives little info, and even from here I can't find anything that would satisfy WP:BIO. Duja► 09:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. DanielEng 07:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm surprised, I thought after reading the article it wouldn't be hard to find independent sources. I didn't have much look. There is insubstantial coverage in The New York Times and in Christianity Today. I think the best solution is to smerge to American Tract Society, as I found no evidence of any notability for anything else. GRBerry 14:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - with reluctance, I have to say that the subject seems NN. I am thus doubtful whether this can be kept. However, I have not researched him and must decline to express a definite view. Peterkingiron 23:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.