The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep. Instead, to challenge the results of the 3rd AFD, please use deletion review. NSLE _(T+C)^{(seen this?)} at 01:28 UTC (2006-04-12)

As this guy does not want an article about himself on Wikipedia, we shouldn't have an article on him here. Disrespecting this guy by having an article on him when he clearly doesn't want one is a personal attack and is against Wikipedia policy. Please don't vote for keep because you think Daniel Brandt is notable. It's not about notability, but about whether or not the person this article is talking about wants an article. 9A 01:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. 152.163.100.7 01:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Keep. I remember someone saying in another AfD respecting someone's privacy is not a reason to delete. Royboycrashfan 01:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • They were wrong. Don't listen to those idiots. You surely would want your privacy respected. Bring back your delete vote. 9A 01:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep We just went through this, and nothing's going to change. Fan1967 01:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Stop war! 01:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. He is notable. Listing him is not an attack. --Tagishsimon (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.