The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:34, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Sparkle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable newspaper JMHamo (talk) 20:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It is nice they do this, but it clearly does not warrant a Wikipedia article.DreamGuy (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unreferenced and no claim to notability. JDDJS (talk) 17:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Does not seem to meet notability standards. JTtheOG (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.