The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (confide) 15:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DBC News

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Earlier PROD removed without improvement to refs. Searches reveal nothing more than own web site, tangential mentions and social media. Cited refs fail to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article meets all of the point of WP:GNG. It has a vast coverage in the Internet. It has right to be a stand alone article in Wikipedia. Rafi (talk) 04:45, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep-The prod was placed after a problematic user removed references. I undid his revision and added the sources back to the article. After which I removed the prod, because a prod can be contested. The nominator sent the page to AFD 8 minutes after the removal of the prod. I further improved the sources. The article is about a national news network and the sources are from various Bangladeshi news organizations including major newspapers. The article is notable and sources do show that.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Press reports of journalists being attacked etc coupled with press releases about the opening of a news station do not amount to notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.