The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete: This is more suitable for Wiktionary, if in fact it would survive there; I will create a wiktionary entry for it and see. Tornado family is the closest I could find of terms in Wikipedia, and that has a loose definition where the tightly clustered members could be referred to as "sandwiches" but might contain more than two cyclones; so this is really a colloquial term used for media attention capture. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone sandwich

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. This is what Wikipedia is not. -War wizard90 (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 00:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Cyclone Lam or Cyclone Marcia. I don't think this qualifies as a neologism. It is more like a metaphor, or one instance of a common meaning of "sandwich", which one dictionary defines as "something resembling or suggesting a sandwich... a plywood sandwich". If it was a neologism, to get its own article it would need secondary sources discussing the term itself, as opposed to simply using it. But it does seem to have been used fairly often in news reports about the 2015 cyclones in Australia, so perhaps the newspaper reference could be merged to one of those. – Margin1522 (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - ____ sandwich is just a popular idiom to describe x between two y. Does not look to pass WP:NEO. If it was coined and used to refer to particular historic cyclones, no opposition to mentioning it there. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - if there is anything not in the main article referenced above, take new info from this article and put it in the article that exists on this topic.

Bfpage |leave a message 21:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass WP:NEO. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite) 23:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a neologism. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.