The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I'm going to stick my neck out here and call it a Speedy Keep.. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of Hungary

[edit]

This article is a perfect example for those articles, wich should rather be deleted, than filled up with tons of templates, wich will obviously never reach their goals. Be realistic. As a hungarian, really funny to read this article, so maybe this should be moved to the bad jokes section, or something like that. External links almost does not match with content, wich is...aah... Critics would be longer than the article itself. This is what is below poor quality. Bartók Béla should deserve much longer sentence, than speak. Contain is a mess, artilce itself is a mess. Delete or totally rewrite, starting from a stub. --Vince ^{hey, yo! :-)} 00:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD is not cleanup. Fixing the changes what were made to the article with this edit is something that any editor can do, and does not involve AFD at all. The time and effort that you spent nominating this article could have been spent actually fixing it. Uncle G 00:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above poster. --Ozgod 01:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep I'm 100% Hungary has culture, therefore it's a viable article, just needs some attention. John Reaves (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Per above comments. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.