The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Although the term was mentioned in CSI and according to Zoe was explicitly called a "cuddle puddle" is an argument towards notability, but does not make the term verifiable or more than a neologism. Furthermore, at best as far as I can tell we would have nothing more than a dicdef. This deletion sets no precedent for an article on the same topic that is more than a dicdef and is well-sourced (presumably with the New York Magazine article). As it is now, the term seems to be too much of a neologism to meet WP:V. JoshuaZ 21:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neologistic, unsourced, 800 G-hits but unable to find a reputible source that verifies the claimed meaning. Many hits refer to a New York magazine article about teen promiscuity that has nothing to do with the drug culture. Deprodded, tagged as possible original research. Over one month old yet the concerns of several editors have not been addressed. Accurizer 22:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.