- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Crypto Aid Israel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:ADMASQ, fails WP:NCORP, based wholly on sentiment for the current horrible Hamas-Israeli conflict. WP:NOTNEWS applies 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: aside from the nom reasons, WP:PROMO very much applies. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict)Delete WP:ARTSPAM Does not meet inclusion criteria. Preys, purposefully or not, on the anguish we feel over the latest war. WP:G11 was declined. I cannot be objective, (about the G11ness) but I think it was G11able. came here from Liz's talk.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: PROMO. This reads like an ad for the effort. Oaktree b (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Cryptowashing of a horrible event should never be entertained here, nor should any kind of aid ever be stuck in a math problem only a computer can solve. WP:PROMO trash. Nate • (chatter) 18:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article definitely looks like some sort of advertisement or promoting a business. Nonetheless, this article doesn't stand to a neutral point of view. Geko72290 (talk) 19:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I understand why the speedy was declined, but the sourcing for this initiative isn't there. Star Mississippi 00:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Source analysis shows that it does not satisfy general notability because the sources are not independent. All of the sources are publications of the cryptocurrency community, and therefore have a conflict of interest. The source analysis is:
Reference Number |
Reference |
Comments |
Independent |
Significant |
Reliable |
Secondary
|
1 |
cointelegraph.com |
Not independent because it reports on the cryptocurrency community |
No |
Not really significant about the event because mostly about the cryptocurrency community |
? |
No
|
2 |
news.bitcoin.com |
Not independent, but significant coverage |
No |
Yes |
? |
No
|
3 |
decrypt.co |
Another publication of the cryptocurrency community |
No |
Not really in enough detail |
? |
No
|
4 |
www.cryptoglobe.com |
Another publication of the cryptocurrency community |
No |
No, mostly asks for donations |
? |
No
|
|
|
|
|
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.