The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crossfire hockey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article's been around for a while, but I can't see the notability. We generally require that teams be at least at a semi-pro level in order to be included; this looks like it's more like a rec league sort of deal. As such, it's likely to be a lot of primary sourced material which cannot be verified through notable reliable sources. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree, the lack of references and lack of Google results make this a Delete.--Talktome^(Intelati) 18:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above, and it really doesn't help that the article is mostly just a big unsourced list of members. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.