The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crimson Knight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources mentioning this horse, and it doesn't have any any refs, so its notability must be questioned. —ems24 22:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I have added two inline citations, although their reliability is somewhat questionable. Guoguo12--Talk--  05:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Seems borderline notable with the addition of Guoguo's refs, as compared with other race horses listed in the same category.  – OhioStandard (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:38, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.