The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as no one other than the nominator recommends it for deletion. — _Maggot^Syn 10:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation Records discography

[edit]

Non notable topic, poorly formatted list, not interesting, not cited, original research, not verified, shall i go on? Myheartinchile (talk) 03:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteMyheartinchile (talk) 03:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While the formatting isn't that good (maybe should be brought up to the standards of the Factory Records catalogue article), you're using the arguement of it being not interesting and poorly formatted (along with others) as a reason for deletion. It should be tagged for references/improvments. This is a notable record label with many well-known bands on it. Lugnuts (talk) 07:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 09:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep AfD is not cleanup, and this is a finite and easily verifiable listing of releases on a very notable record label. "Not interesting?"... please! --Canley (talk) 10:57, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep vote from me. Whilst it is a bit of a mess, the subject is entirely worthy and really only requires cleanup. Lugnuts's reference to the Factory Records article is a good call and an accurate equivalent to take cues from. Deletion reasoning is a touch flawed, too. OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 11:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Encyclopedic and fairly easily verifiable, even if lacking references at present. Most of these releases are listed in Martin Strong's "The Great Alternative & Indie Discography", and I would imagine elsewhere too.--Michig (talk) 11:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.