The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Craze Digital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I searched for independant, reliable sources that would make this company notable under WP:CORP, but there doesn't appear to be anything that would make it notable. The best argument for keep that I could think of would be the one lawsuit mentioned by 3 different sources, but that still wouldn't make this company notable per WP:ILLCON. I understand that AfD is not cleanup, and I have tried to improve the article (see the talk page and article history), but I can't fix nonexistent notability. Clovermoss (talk) 15:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.