The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This academic essay clearly violates WP:SYN. It does not merely describe Stanley Deetz' theory, (but offers an evaluation of it and related work; there might be a possibility of an article on the general subject, , but it would best be done by starting over. A more likely possibility is an article on Deetz. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]