The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator and there's a consensus that the subject meets WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conor Downey

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ATH as Irish league not fully professional Steve-Ho (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Steve-Ho (talk) 04:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He will be mentioned in numerous secondary sources - football reports, articles, etc Mooretwin (talk) 09:30, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - he will be mentioned or he is mentioned? Quite an important difference there! Giant Snowman 21:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per WP:GNG.--Vintagekits (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - fails WP:ATHLETE but meets WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 21:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not will be mentioned but has been mentioned in these 335 sources, including, in the first 30 that I checked, these where he is the focus of the articles: [1][2][3][4][5]. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has played in notable top-level league Eldumpo (talk) 12:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.