The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conner Versetile

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, only released mixtapes and the studio album being released is self-released. Insulam Simia (talk) 08:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thesmartone434 10:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)This Article should not be deleted because it has been edited and this person is partially notable. The reasons that the article was submitted for deletion was corrected, so therefore it is no need for this article to be deleted

I'm sorry to tell you that you have not fixed the problem. Do take a look at WP:BAND for the notability guidelines. Insulam Simia (talk) 10:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero references, and I can't find any. "Partially notable"? Is that like partially pregnant? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:58, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No attempt made to demonstrate notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent WP:RS to establish subject's notability. --Artene50 (talk) 02:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.