The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Connal Kelleher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This appears to be a vanity article for a non-notable British wrestler. A Google search turns up nothing to support the statements in the article - perhaps our friends who have expertise in British wrestling can confirm if this is a hoax. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as hoax; the kid would be 16! Blackmetalbaz (talk) 15:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i am 16 but as you can see im not professional so i would appreciate it if you took this back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Connal Kelleher (talk • contribs)

• Delete Hoax or not, completely non-notable, self-promotional by the subject of the article, no reason to keep. Theseeker4 (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - self-promoting vanity article, if not a hoax. No reliable sources avaliable through a google search, if any sources at all. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 04:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, definitely self-promotion/hoax. A Google search brings back zip. Nikki♥311 15:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.