The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 20:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conculture[edit]

Conculture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No claim of notability. A quick web search with conculture and Salvador produces only results for Wikipedia + mirrors. maybe a redirect to constructed culture would be better? Montchav 16:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. If notable, no WP:RS have been provided to prove it. -- Pastordavid 17:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Move - I believe its refering to CONCULTURA, which stands for Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes (organizations by the same name exist eslewhere, but that particular acronym is for the one in El Salvador) [1]. I'm nowhere near smart enough to know whether this should be moved to the acronym, full name, English, or Spanish. Smmurphy^(Talk) 07:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Comes close to being speedy-able as WP:CSD#A3, 'no content'. The article's title, 'Conculture', also seems like a problem of neologism (WP:NEO) since that word isn't used in English. EdJohnston 02:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.