The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
All right. First off, it's got quite a few unbacked claims ("Computrols has established a solid reputation over the past 20 plus years as a leader in building automation systems"), and describes customers as "benefiting from the power, simplicity, and reliability of Computrols," which violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy. The article needs some good reliable sources. Also, it needs to include some reason why we should care about this company (that is, why it is notable) and rather than just say "It's a notable company", it needs to prove it and show why exactly this company is important enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. The article as it appears currently reads like an advertisement written by someone at the company. —Scott5114↗03:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This appears like spam and vanity, but could it be rewritten to not seem like it? :: Colin Keigher20:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.