The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. As for a merge, there is too much information to warrant a history merge for a brief entry. Keegan^talk 07:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Computer Assisted Biologically Augmented Lifeform

[edit]

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just an in-universe plot repetition of plot section information from the Command and Conquer series article and the game articles. It is therefore duplicative, has no non-plot information, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's still a major character and there's a decent amount of information on him here. Geshpenst (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 12:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another 06:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I found nothing on Google News, Books or Scholar. AnteaterZot (talk) 17:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How about game reviews? --Pixelface (talk) 11:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Do you have any? AnteaterZot (talk) 01:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Reviews for games in the Tiberian series? Here's a few: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] --Pixelface (talk) 02:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Begrudging delete I'm a massive fan of everything C&C, so would love to vote keep here, but ultimately the only truly iconic character from the series out of universe is Kane. CABAL was only a main character in the expansion pack of a one game, and a minor character in the main game. Merits an entry in Nod characters of Command & Conquer but not an independant articleCaissa's DeathAngel (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Nod characters of Command & Conquer, per CDA. Someone another 22:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the Nod characters of Command & Conquer per Caissa & Someone. More references wouldn't hurt either. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 11:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the C&C task force really need to get their heads round referencing, this is hardly going to be the only XFD for their articles if that doesn't happen unfortunately.Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.