The result was Keep. ChetblongT C 03:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. No evidence of notability, no reliable independent sources. 1,410 Google hits look somewhat promising, but (among the first 1,000 of those), there are only 58 distinct ones.[1] AMong the 6 Google books hist[2], some are not independent, one cannot be accessed, and one describes it as "a minuscule new party", which is not really promising.[3]. Theer are no hits for this party in Google News[4]. When you couple this lack of reliable sources with their preference to operate clandestinely, there aren't much arguments left wh we should have an article on them. Fram (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Secondly, this party is important because its the result of the antirevisionist struggle in New Zealand. This struggle was held worldwidely and in almost countries. This is an important part of the communism history and its certainly under the scope of politics science. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]