The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep -- Y not? 19:40, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comillar Kagoj

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Leela Bratee 19:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:V. Woodroar (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - May not pass N or GNG right now, but an experienced editor with some time may be able to dig up enough native sources to keep this. As it is right now, the stub is just too small, but the website offers more info that I cannot translate. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is the Bengali name of this newspaper: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The nomination should be invalid, as it lacks rationale. As for the notability of this newspaper, it is necessary to search for sources written in Bengali, such as this (?) --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True, if the nominator fails to advance an argument for deletion, then it qualifies for WP:SK#1. But since another editor has given a delete argument, the debate shouldn't necessarily be speedily closed. It is not necessary to search for sources written in a different language, but given that the newspaper probably doesn't have many English sources anyway, looking for Bengali sources is probably a good route to take. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The other user didn't give a delete argument, but just a teaspoonful of alphabet soup. And how can anyone possibly determine whether this is notable or not without searching for Bengali sources? Of course it's necessary if we're to base the discussion on evidence rather than guesswork and prejudice. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator is Bengali, so I'm trusting that she searched for sources and found them lacking. Woodroar (talk) 03:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator submitted a number of publications at the same time to AfD, and all of those were closed and remain (although improved). You can see the history to verify. To the nominator's credit, the editor found stubs that desperately needed help. I've stayed out of this one as I can't find English sources. Zayeem's contribution below is helpful but there should be more out there. Crtew (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It must be a major newspaper in Comilla, the government district portal of Comilla ranks the newspaper fourth.--Zayeem ^(talk) 07:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 03:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.