- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was you should be using drv not renominating as soon as the prev discussion closed. but dont hold your breath for the drv to go your way. Spartaz Humbug! 07:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- CollXtion I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable studio EP by non-notable singer. References include brief mentions, sales websites, celebrity twitter messages and status, blog posts from fans. This article fails WP:GNG. The EP fails WP:NALBUMS. The article looks like a publicity blitz to me, as another editor said previously at the first nomination for this article. User:Miniapolis said " Although the song has charted, I don't see it meeting WP:GNG (which trumps WP:NALBUMS) yet. This seems to be a trend with marginally-notable musicians: creating individual articles about them and all their recordings, in the apparent hope that something will survive AfD. I hope it's nipped in the bud." WordSeventeen (talk) 04:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I've struck my quote, which was used here without my consent. Although I disagree with the original discussion's outcome (especially the NAC here), deletion review of the NAC is IMO a more appropriate response than opening another deletion discussion on the heels of the first; this, to me, is POINTy. Miniapolis 12:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.