The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colemine Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the references given in this article lack independence from the subject. A quick Internet search only turned up hits like YouTube videos and social networking site (Facebook, twitter, etc.). I did not find non-trivial evidence of notability in reliable, independent, verifiable, secondary sources. KDS4444 (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for lack of notability. Sourced to primary sources and promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable garage "label" "producing" no one anyone ever heard of beyond their mothers. Nha Trang ^Allons! 21:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.