The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cobas tree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

misinformation JMK 11:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC) From the first entry this article gave completely incorrect information. Anyone can check that the Cobas (not Cobas tree) is not a Pachypodium but in the Vitaceae, genus Cyphostemma.[reply]

The article seems to mix up three species, Cyphostemma currorii, which is the Cobas of Namibia-Angola, Pachypodium namaquanum, the Halfmens of RSA-Namibia, and Pachypodium lealii, which is reported to be used for arrow poison, and then not by Van Wyk as far as I can see. Recommend: Delete and start over with correct name. JMK 11:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --ROASTYTOAST 21:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Pachypodium namaquanum' should be the article title as per plant MOS. If all the info is infact wrong, apart from the name, then I agree Delete, otherwise move to correct name. cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 22:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.