The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clyde Vidrine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One event CynofGavuf 12:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Except there's two events... his involvement in the corruption allegations and his public murder. Weak keep - BalthCat (talk) 18:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep BalthCat is right. There are two events here, and notability can be established the usual way. This source, specifically, convinces me that an article on the subject is appropriate. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not every murder is notable. There are insufficient references and this is definitely not an encyclopedia article. Newt ^(winkle) 07:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.