The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm not sure that the "You can't prod an article that has been previously deleted at AFD" rationale is in line with the spirit or the intention of that guideline, but the consensus here to delete anyway is still pretty clear. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Club Xanadu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted at AfD in 2005 - not notable. My prod was removed with the message that I could not prod it as it has been at AfD before (although then it was a delete). Boleyn (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: WP:PRODNOM does not differ betweeen a keep or delete AfD, it just says, "has not been and is not being discussed at AfD," (my emphasis). Since this article was already discussed at AfD as evidenced by the link above, I removed the PROD. Going from an AfD to PROD is like a step backwards. Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 17:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No references. The only claim to notability is to try to tie to Bruce Springsteen, but notability cannot be inherited.--Rpclod (talk) 03:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No reliable references, and I can't seem to find much on the internet. The notability mentioned here is inherited, as Rpclod says, which does not suffice as notability. Upjav (talk) 04:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Its presence on the internet creates tumbleweeds. Delete away.--Canyouhearmenow 11:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.