The result was keep. John254 00:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Not mentioned in any secondary sources for anything it has done. Steve Dufour (talk) 03:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this organization is well-known it should have a WP article. I had never heard of it before and the article so far only has a few passing references to events that it sponsored, nothing about the group itself, from the news media or other secondary sources. Most of the other information in the article is taken from the group's own website. Due to commitments I am taking another break, hopefully long, from Project Scientology. (p.s. I agree that the fact that the CoS engages in political lobbying should be mentioned on WP, but the name of the group they founded to do this does not seem so notable as to have its own article.) Steve Dufour (talk) 17:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a list of Scientology related organizations it could be merged into? Redddogg (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]