The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cerebellum (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chronicles Of Syntax

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Denied PROD. Concern still stands: No independent sources. No indication of any notability. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:WEB. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable and promotional. Has no coverage in reliable sources, and I can not locate any reviews. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can provide evidnece of true notability, such as high number of Utube views. This sounds like Am-Dram in another format. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.