The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus. CitiCat ^♫ 23:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Gray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. Delete GreenJoe 20:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -community involvement and candidacy make article relevant NDP Johnny 21:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Candidacy does not make one inherently notable. She serves on some community boards. So do I. But that doesn't necessarily confer notability. She volunteers for community organizations and for a political party. Very laudable, but do do hundreds of thousands of people. The totality of the bio paint the picture of a very involved and active person. But it doesn't make her notable. Montco 23:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Very Weak Delete as stated by Montco.--JForget 00:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as she's the leader of a local party and current candidate for a national parliament. Bearian 16:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Failed local candidate, and no accomplishments outside of local politics. --Calton | Talk 01:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• weak Keep borderline case needs better sourcing to establish notability, YWCA award needs sourcing, Gnangarra 11:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.