This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a Neologism, goes against the policy Wikipedia:No_original_research, and basically advertises the author's pet theory. This page, and the author's website were linked-to from Neoteny. Try a google search on "Christian Neoteny". Dosai 18:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, original research / soapbox. Tempshill 18:25, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete drini ☎ 21:08, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete original research.-Poli (talk • contribs) 23:16, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
• Delete POV original research. JamesBurns 08:17, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete POV Mccready 08:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.