The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep —αlεx•mullεr 12:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Falangist Party of America

[edit]

There's been some discussion already as to its notability, but there doesn't appear to actually be any. Two trivial RS hits. The vast majority is an unsourced copyvio. Removing that eliminates the article essentially as ghits don't demonstrate any notability. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 17:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. They seem to have some interest with people interested in US third parties, often showing up on lists, but there are only two trivial hits as nom said; can't really find anything that confirms any actual party activities. Hazillow (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found a few hits from major newspapers including the Guardian and the Iowa State Daily. The article needs better citations from verifiable sources, but in the mean time I think it should be kept. Dgf32 (talk) 19:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Verifiable political parties should be kept. The info in the copyvio can be rewritten if it seems reliable . DGG (talk) 05:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I am in agreeance with DGG on this one. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Dgf32, there are plenty of reliable sources available on the subject such that this can be expanded. (jarbarf) (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.