The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Roberts (author)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable author -- a few self-published books with trivial reviews. DGG ( talk ) 19:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article does not meet the notability guidelines for creative professionals. Okamialvis (talk) 21:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I concur, he's not significantly substantiated with the needed substance and there's nothing convincing in what the article conveys as information, therefore this is all too trivial. SwisterTwister talk 04:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not ready for prime time. His books all appear self-published and there don't appear to be sufficient sources in the article or available elsewhere to support the claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 05:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.