The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chit Swe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Looks like it was translated from another language. Really is poor in grammar, and overall structure. §tepshep • ¡Talk to me! 03:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep This one reads so poorly that I may just have to give it the benefit of the doubt. As it stands, it seems he might be notable, although it really needs a cleanup. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. National government cabinet minister. Pburka (talk) 04:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. As a major member of a national government, I would say he's pretty much inherently notable. As for the general crapitude of the article, that can be solved via methods other than deletion. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 04:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Week Keep - needs a major cleanup, but does assert notability. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 05:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Person is notable, but article needs major clean-up. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 21:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a notable person, in the top 10% of notability of wikipedia biography subjects. (I have done a bit of cleaning up) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.