The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, AFD is not the place for content disputes like this. Canley (talk) 11:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Australian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Completing an IP nomination. The reason given was "Because the article and this talk page consistently contains untrue and offensive material, and remain so after repeated warnings, this page has been declared UNTRUE AND OFFENSIVE and will be DELETED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE." No vote from me. Stifle (talk) (trivial vote) 10:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep: Content disputes aren't for AfD to decide. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 11:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep/close per DeadEyeArrow. Notability is firmly established. Gizza^{Discuss ©} 11:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.