The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheryl Dinolfo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local (county-level) politician. Does not meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Only routine local coverage in Rochester, NY. MB 17:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MB 17:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MB 17:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The county level of office is not automatically notable under WP:NPOL — people at that level of office may occasionally qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia if they can be shown to be much more significant than the norm, such as by writing a really substantial and really well-sourced article that addresses the importance of her work in the role, but are not automatically entitled to have minimally-sourced and résumé-like articles just because they exist. But with two primary sources and one hit of local coverage in an alt-weekly, this isn't sourced anywhere near well enough to get her over the bar she actually has to clear. Bearcat (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete This article is noteworthy. Chery's predecessor, Maggie Brooks has an article. Please explain to me how this article is different. Both people need articles so people can find out more about these people. Dswitz10734 (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It's entirely possible that Maggie Brooks isn't notable either and should thus also be deleted, which would be a reason to delete both articles rather than a reason to keep this one — but also keep in mind that her article is also a lot longer and a lot better sourced, and contains a lot more substance to suggest that she might be notable for more than just being a county executive per se. So the fact that she has an article is not relevant to whether this article meets our rules and standards or not. Bearcat (talk) 14:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete county executives are not default notable. Weather Ms. Brooks is really notable I am not sure yet, but her being notable does not make anyone who serves after her in the office notable. Mia B. Love was mayor of Saratoga Springs, Utah and we have had an article on her almost since she first became notable. This does not mean her successor as mayor of Saratoga Springs, Utah is notable. Whether Mrs. Love was actually a notable individual at the time I first created the article on her I am not sure. She clearly is now, because she served 2 terms as a member of the US House, but that does not mean she was when I first created the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NPOL. scope_creep^Talk 09:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.