The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:53, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cherkashyn Anton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable. Bulka UA (talk) 14:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete self-promotional CV. No evidence or claim of notability. --Elekhh (talk) 12:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for much the same reasons - I can't confirm that the subject is indeed notable. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.